Corporate Social Responsibility Discussion

August 12th, 2009 by Elizabeth Ulion
View Comments


Corporations are beholden to their shareholders. They exist to make a profit. For this reason what good can a corporate social responsibility statement or plan really do?

chair_OfficeNow“Managers should try to act more responsibly. But they should not expect the market to necessarily reward them–or punish their less responsible competitors,” stated a 2008 Forbes article. While many have claimed that a socially responsible company will do better in business there has been little evidence to support this across the economy.  ““Part of the reason why CSR does not necessarily pay is that only a handful or consumers know or care about the environmental or social records of more than a handful of firms,” said David Vogel, a professor at U.C. Berkley’s business school. The public is more concerned with price, convenience and quality when purchasing products.

Even those who are aware of the impact a company has on the world will find it extremely difficult to find a completely responsible or irresponsible supplier of their needed wares. An example given by Vogel was Merck. The pharmaceutical giant “has been widely applauded for its development and free distribution of a drug to cure river-blindness, a dreadful disease which affects tens of millions of the world’s poorest people. Yet this same company withheld important information regarding the safety of its highly profitable drug Vioxx.”

While it’s always nice to hear about a company building green or donating to charities for many corporate social responsibility is more about what the company does not do. Betsy Atkins , CEO of Baja Ventures highlighted what CSR should focus on:

–Transparency in financial reporting
–A quality product, not misrepresented through marketing
–If something about the product endangers the consumer, be forthright and let the public know
–Do not use predatory practices in offshore manufacturing, such as child labor.
–Do not pollute your environment or other environments, and adhere to laws and regulations.
–Be respectful, fair and open in your employment practices.

There are also misconceptions surrounding corporate social responsibility.  Deborah Doane, the chair of the Britain organization CORE Coalition listed four common myths of CSR.

  1. The market can deliver both short-term financial returns and long-term social benefits – the interests of businesses are often at odds and responsible investment is unlikely to pay off as quickly as the stock market requires
  2. The ethical consumer will drive change – again, consumers are looking for price and convenience, just look at Wal-Mart
  3. There will be a competition to be the most ethical business – often CSR is just good PR without any incentive for changes in behavior
  4. Countries will compete to have the best ethical practices – competitive pressure for foreign investment has created a system where less stringent for human rights standards or environmental regulations attract more investors.

What do you think? Yell it out at SocialYell.com! Or in the comments below.

Elizabeth Ulion is a graduate student at Northwestern University.

Photo courtesy of Office Now/Flickr.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Twitt this!
  • Ben

    It's true, you can't rely on the majority of consumers to choose the socially or environmentally responsible products – especially when sustainable investment adds a premium to most products, so it is weak logic to expect the open market to pick the responsible companies as the winners. Particularly in these tough economic times, consumers are bounded by their bank accounts, meaning they will pick the most economic products. Because of this a responsible government has to step in and give benefits to responsible companies to ensure these practices and products are supported. Otherwise, businesses will not be encouraged to take the expensive measures needed to reduce their waste, pay their workers fairly, and obtain carbon-neutral production and transportation.

  • http://www.b-yond.biz/en elaine cohen

    hi, CSR is about corporations taking reponsibility for their impacts, improving them, and doing it transparently. I agree that short term thinking on financials prevents optimum long term benefit (both financial and social) I believe that, with the critical mass of global companies now moving along the CSR journey, CSR is no longer a key differentator, but one of the several variables against which a company is assessed, together with financial performance. I do not believe consumers are driving this change – though consumer and activist movements are surely making a contribution – but that business leaders are realizing that CSR makes sense as a business strategy both financially and ethically. This being said, there is still some way to go, and the key differentiator in any business , quite simply, is the buy-in and commitment of its CEO to CSR practices. If that is present, the business will do it. Some CEO's buy it because it feels right, some because it shows up as good strategy, and some because its a form of risk management. Mainstreaming CSR is about mainstreaming CSR CEO's.

  • http://www.davemacdonald.ca Dave Macdonald

    From my perspective, there are really two factors at work here. The first is that the notion of CSR is not well-defined, despite the fact it's relatively mainstream. The second is that, and this is probably because of its lack of specific definition, is very rarely indoctrinated in an organization's strategy. When CSR is a bolt-on activity, operationally driven, or a facade over the true operations of the company (see Merck example above), it's a marketing stunt. Even if the effects of the activity are widespread, it's not strategic in this sense and that is the real downfall of this kind of CSR.

  • Imran Aijazuddin

    Companies should place a strong emphasis on corporate social responsibility (CSR). But CSR is not their primary obligation. Any for-profit organization must place shareholders, who invest their precious money into it, first. Also, CSR is a profitable investment when done correctly. Businesses should realize that investing in sustainable alternatives to virtually any product or service can attract consumers. Sustainable products are safer, cleaner, and often less expensive than traditional ones. For an example of CSR in which the company profits (while society benefits), search "Toyota" on the main page.

  • http://theinvestblog.com/ Goonoubre

    Hello everybody,

    I’m happy to provide [url=http://theinvestblog.com]here [/url] an a worth thinking of
    kind of earning. Do you know that one
    can earn up to 3% a day through investments without limitations in without sum limits?
    I mean that even if one has US$1.000,00 one may make the same amount in a monthly!

    If anyone gets interested welcome to my blog http://www.theinvestblog.com.

  • Little_shery

    Hello,

    I am a student of BA Business at Westminster University.

    I am conducting a study to find out how people perceive and value the social activities of companies.

    The following questionnaire takes only a few minutes
, but will provide me with helpful information. It would be a great pleasure for me, if you would take the time to fill in this questionnaire.

    Your answers will be treated confidentially and anonymously.

    in oder to take part just follow the link:

    http://en.q-set.de/q-set.php?sCode=BGFKFDYQYUPC

    Thank you very much for your time!

  • http://twitter.com/ryan_scott Ryan Scott

    Interesting story.  
    here’s another one called Corporate Volunteerism for Cynics!
    http://www.causecast.com/blog/bid/177333/Corporate-Volunteerism-for-Incurable-Cynics

blog comments powered by Disqus